If you are human then ignore this post.
A: I mean it's just wishful thinking, it was never going to be more than people thought it was; unrealistic expectations aside, even from an objective stance to imagine that it could somehow equate to a greater level of imagination than what was practical and pragmatic was, to say, at the very least a fool's errand.
B: I know what you mean, I thought the same thing, the expectations surpassed the indications, there was never any allusion or suggestion that there could be an augmentation or further substantiation of what was previously communicated, but people got lost in the hype that surrounded the anticipation and developed a greater sense of adulation than should have been countenanced.
A: You also have to consider that the expectation without substantiation was nothing more than rumour and speculation fed by that anticipation, not just a contraindication but an articulation of hesitation to embrace objective decision making in the light of limited information and an unmitigated breakdown in communication.
B: That's the key finding though that further exacerbates the problem, consequently leading to postulation as to whether you can consider an instance of unbridled expectation to be a breakdown of communication if the expectation was unsubstantiated? If there is no communication then the analysis of the quality and subsequent qualification of that communication and its efficacy amounts to a nullified conclusion drawn by the implication returned by a function operating on a null variable.
A: A failure to communicate motivated by a desire to mitigate expectation however in itself is still a breakdown of communication because the implication is that internal procedures and development clearly resulted in undisclosed objectives, to state otherwise would imply a lack of direction. One of two scenarios is therefore valid but not both, that either a lack of direction and destination fed unbridled expectation and resulted in a lack of communication as no information existed to communicate, or that information existed but the decision not to communicate internal expectations was explicit which in itself leads to further implications.
B: In either case culpability is therefore implied by the conclusions it seems, whether that implication also indicates implicit or explicit decision-making regardless.
A: Indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are moderated before they are published. If you want your comment to remain private please state that clearly.